Erratum: A note on Kesten's Choquet-Deny lemma

Sebastian Mentemeier (University of Wroclaw)

Abstract


This is an erratum for ECP volume 18 paper 65 (2013). In Proposition 3.1, Condition (C) does not imply that the set Λ(Γ) generates a dense subgroup of R. This has to be made an assumption. Alternatively, one can assume that the matrices are invertible.


Full Text: Download PDF | View PDF online (requires PDF plugin)

Pages: 1-2

Publication Date: March 19, 2014

DOI: 10.1214/ECP.v19-3381

References

  • D. Buraczewski, E. Damek and Y. Guivarc'h, On multidimensional Mandelbrot's cascades, ArXiv e-prints, (2011). arXiv:1109.1845v1
  • D. Buraczewski, E. Damek, Y. Guivarc'h and S. Mentemeier, On multidimensional Mandelbrot's cascades (2014). arXiv:1109.1845v2
  • Kesten, Harry. Random difference equations and renewal theory for products of random matrices. Acta Math. 131 (1973), 207--248. MR0440724
  • Mentemeier, Sebastian. A note on Kesten's Choquet-Deny lemma. Electron. Commun. Probab. 18 (2013), no. 65, 7 pp. MR3091723
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.